Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 13,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2016, 9:29 am
The panel also extended the Wynne v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:29 am
The panel also extended the Wynne v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:29 am
The panel also extended the Wynne v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma pursuant to CAFA, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:32 am
In Ferrerese v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:24 am
See Jawad v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:28 pm
United States, 440 U.S. 48, 55, 99 S.Ct. 914, 918, 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979); Matter of Jones, 768 F.2d 923, 927 (7th Cir.1985). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:00 pm
Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inv. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am
LLC v Amedore Concord, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 50152(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Jan. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am
LLC v Amedore Concord, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 50152(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Jan. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
The Noise Control Act contains the finding that “The Congress declares that it is the policy of the United States to promote an environment for all Americans free from noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
The general public consensus was that publishers had failed to keep works in print, failed to support authors, and that Google was a savior to both authors and the publishing industry.The Authors Guild's (well-written) take from https://www.authorsguild.org/authors-guild-v-google-questions-answers/On October 16, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reached a decision in our copyright infringement lawsuit Authors Guild… [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:58 pm
(United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:53 am
Once the mandate issues, the case will be ripe for a possible petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:46 am
Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 6:06 am
In 2012, a divided United States Supreme Court ruled in Miller v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:19 am
In his 1995 decision for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
