Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 6,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2010, 7:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am
” Commentary on the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:02 pm
” All which is against the peace and dignity of this State, and evil example to others in like manner to offend. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
[Committee Print]APRIL 19, 2010111TH CONGRESS2D SESSION H. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:27 am
The case is Banks v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:32 am
In Fahrenholz v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:02 pm
If Monday’s session had about it anything that seemed peculiar to electronic privacy under the Constitution, it was the Justices’ interest in whether federal or state laws that guarantee such privacy should be taken as creating an “expectation of privacy” under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 4:04 pm
Prior to a suspension from all duties with pay, the Chancellor or his designee shall consult with the UFT President or his designee.The DOE shall prefer charges pursuant to Education Law §3020-a[i] within 60 days of an employee being reassigned or suspended, except in cases where the reassignment or suspension was caused by (i) an allegation of sexual misconduct as defined in CBA Article 21(G)(6) that is being investigated by the Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm
The court stated: “The opening of sessions of legislative and other deliberative public bodies with prayer is deeply embedded in the history and tradition of this country. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
No court will go along with this today as stated. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm
This has resulted in a backlog of unresolved cases pending before the NLRB and in a case pending before the United States Supreme Court calling for the Supreme Court to decide whether the National Labor Relations Act permits the NLRB to act when there are only two sitting members of the NLRB, New Process Steel v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:10 pm
When I vote these state constitutional issues, I almost always vote "yes". [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:10 pm
When I vote these state constitutional issues, I almost always vote "yes". [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
An approved State claims act would allow the State to retain an additional 10% share of recoveries. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT JOHN PORTER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:49 am
In the separate matter of Williams v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:14 pm
The Court adopted the description of the Article 8 / 10 balancing exercise given by Lord Hoffmann in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457, at [55] and [56] (a case brought by Naomi Campbell against a newspaper which had published photographs of her leaving a drug treatment session): ‘when press freedom comes into conflict with another interest protected by the law, the question is whether there is a sufficient public interest in that particular publication to… [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
