Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 5741 - 5760 of 6,089
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If P&G is promoting a diaper v. if it’s the content created by P&G that you’re promoting. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  State has no legit interest in telling you (food seller) to put that message on food. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  In a timeline of self-execution, comes after Missouri v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings The Maryland General Assembly is on the verge of adopting a vaguely worded, legally dubious tax on digital advertising in the final days of this session—now paired with new tobacco taxes. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
  After all, the sex buyer and the sex seller are entering into an arrangement that may include other parties (e.g., pimps). [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Scope and Impact of Safe Harbors  Official description: Scope of entities and activities covered by safe harbors; incentives (and disincentives) for creators, copyright owners, online providers, investors, and users; impact on licensing activities; effectiveness of remedies, including ability to proceed in federal court in case of disputed notice or misrepresentation; economic impact on creators, copyright owners, service providers and copyrighted works; relevant empirical data; and other… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:31 am by Jeffrey W. Berkman, Esq.
  Is it the business lock, stock and barrel or does the seller intend on keeping any of the assets. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:45 pm by Andrew Hudson
A series of cases sought to clarify the defence in s123, for the benefit of brand owners, the most definitive of which was Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130. [read post]