Search for: "Sides v. Beene" Results 5741 - 5760 of 25,494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
Judge Jacobson concludes that Lakia is correct: "Both sides in this case have cited the seminal New Jersey decision that led to the adoption of the civil union statute and that of course is Lewis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Florian Mueller
More recently, however, the European Commission has been very reluctant to go after those aggressively enforcing their SEPs (such as in Nokia v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 7:11 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
As with the privilege itself, lawyers and their clients often place too much blind faith in such agreements, believing they safely and fully insulate work done jointly by all those on one side of the “v” in a case. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 8:22 am by Larry
It is as if that first case had never been filed. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:45 am
It's been a while since my last post but in my defense, I've been pretty busy of late. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:01 am by Gritsforbreakfast
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 6:12 am by David Oscar Markus
 The defendant is on the stand now (and has been for the past 3 days).I understand that the defense has moved a number of times for mistrial based on the virus, but those motions have been denied. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:58 am by Bexis
Bartlett – that is to say Mutual Pharmacy Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 5:14 pm
Moderate, promising to look at both sides. [read post]
8 May 2023, 7:53 am
You do not have to have been arrested to know about the Miranda warning. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:34 am
It's been a while since my last post but in my defense, I've been pretty busy of late. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 8:43 am by Steve Vladeck
A little over two months ago, I wrote about the Obama Administration's eye-opening amicus brief in support of the Petitioner in Douglas v. [read post]