Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 5741 - 5760 of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm by Steve Kalar
Id.Issue(s): “Castro argues that a conviction under section 288(c)(1) does not constitute a ‘crime of violence’ warranting a sixteen-level increase under United States Sentencing Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
They walk around confused about sponsorship b/c of their priors! [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
  This is:Our preemption idea harks back to PLIVA v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:10 am by Jonathan D. Glater
This is, as the government notes in its brief, akin to arguing that if A owes money to B and B owes money to C, then C can sue A to compel payment of B, because otherwise B might not pay C. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:14 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1158(b)(2)(C), the government can issue rules to address a spike in immigration, as long as such rules are “consistent” with the asylum provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm by Giles Peaker
A ‘bright line’ rule was permissible for social welfare measures, see, for example R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (Just for Kids Law intervening) (2015) UKSC 57, and would be even more so for a charity: These points apply a fortiori in relation to a proportionality assessment in respect of a measure taken by a charity, such as AIHA’s allocation policy. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:15 pm
  So, what exactly is the state-of-mind requirement of 2778(c)? [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Each post in this Year in Review series features a different federal courthouse in each state of the Union. [read post]