Search for: "State v. Word" Results 5741 - 5760 of 40,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2020, 2:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
To turn to speech hostile to a group I belong to (Jews), when I talked about a rare recent group libel case, the Montana State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
 And there's no definition anywhere of the word "the". [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by INFORRM
”  This appears to be the first endorsement by an appellate court of the approach taken by Mr Justice Mitting on this issue in the case of TLT v (1) The Secretary of State for the Home Department and (2) The Home Office [2016] EWHC 2217. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:20 am by Dave Rein
I previously wrote that I was hoping the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:42 am by Ron Coleman
Whether domain name registrants are cybersquatting on the trademark depends on a number of factors that are discussed in Imagine Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 8:27 am by Keith E. Whittington
San Diego State University's actions here are eerily reminiscent of the situation assessed by a federal circuit court in Hardy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In other words, if the state of the case law is murky, they get the benefit of the doubt. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]