Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 16,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 10:12 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
In addition, there is a strong chance that the Court next Term could be reexamining its controversial ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum, the Court held that the statute did not apply extraterritorially absent strong domestic activity that touches and concerns the United States sufficient to activate the statute. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:21 am
Just two months after the decision in Nalls & Melvin v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:09 pm
But DOMA essentially undoes the uniform definition that existed--one that relied on the state law definition (and expected states to give "Full Faith and Credit" to each others' determination when a person moved from one state to another). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
Sackett v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Although Mr Seal ultimately lost, his claim – and in particular a strong dissenting judgment by Baroness Hale in the House of Lords – highlights the tricky line the state must tread in relation to people with mental health problems in relation to their access to justice. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
And it makes it possible, as a narrative rationalization constitution of the presumptions inherent in this structuring psychology, the strong presumption of passivity and justified reaction (whatever its scope) of everyone else. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:44 pm
’” Yamaha Corp. of America v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Kappos v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:34 pm
Case is Fischer v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 3:58 pm
Kauai v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 9:23 pm
Beck v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 4:16 pm
Beck v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Open justice requires and means scrutiny of the state. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
Originally called Sun Microsystems Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd and another (noted by the IPKat here), the case of Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein was marked out by the IPKat as a thunderously bad decision when the Court of Appeal reversed the decision of Kitchin J at [2010] EWCA Civ 997. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 8:02 am
Ohman J:or Fonder AB v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
The Second Department noted: There is strong public policy in this state against restitution or recoupment of the overpayment of child support. [read post]
