Search for: "US v. Smith" Results 5741 - 5760 of 9,459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  The term "Terry frisks" comes from the Supreme Court decision Terry v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:48 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Smith, 494 U.S. 624, 631-632 (1990)), and her personal feeling about the plea bargain offered, which does not disclose what actually transpired in court. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  So I wasn’t surprised when he used his dissent from the en banc decision last week in State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
Jardines — scope of Fourth Amendment application to police use of a drug-sniffing dog on the exterior of a private home (grant limited to Question 1) 11-817 — Florida v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
In the end, he used the land for storing cars as part of his taxi business. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
In the end, he used the land for storing cars as part of his taxi business. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:36 am by Dennis Crouch
For a patentable subject matter issue, the document might be Mayo v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:34 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: JOSHUA JORGEN HANSON v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:21 am by Alexandra Allan
For more information, please see the recent Reed Smith Client Alert by Richard Gunn and Konstantinos Bachxevanis. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:52 am
" It follows that, as Pumfrey J said in Halliburton Energy Services Inc v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1623 (Pat), [2006] RPC at [60] "over-meticulousness is not to be equated to carefulness. [read post]