Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 10,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2021, 8:25 am
” Couture v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:43 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing in McBurney v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
Healthcare and Federalism: Should courts strictly scrutinize federal regulation of medical services?
14 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
United States errs in accepting Randy's argument against the constitutionality of PACA's individual mandate, take a look at Mark Hall's excellent post at Balkinzation or David Orentlicher's post over at Health Law Profs blog. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
And unkind reader of the evolving dispute over the Louboutin red sole trade mark in the United States might be forgiven for saying that murky rules of unclear application are found there too. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:33 pm
” If the answer is affirmative, the DNI must report how many such searches were conducted; When the United States first began relying upon FISA to support collection of information of “large numbers of United States persons with no known connection to suspicious activity[;]“ Whether the government’s statements to the Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:23 pm
Anheuser-Busch, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 3:23 pm
"marked", by the injection. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:00 am
The decision marks a continuation of U.S. efforts to reassure its Eastern European allies concerned over a newly aggressive Russia, and will be the first time that the United States has stored heavy equipment in NATO members from the former Soviet bloc. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:56 am
EPE stood its ground, also stating that it had built up significant goodwill in its trade marks and logos to the extent that a substantial body of the public, upon seeing those marks and logos, would believe those goods or services to be those of EPE and its lawful licensees. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:30 am
v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:17 am
The United States and Turkey have both asked the Kurds to postpone the vote in the interest of stabilizing Iraqi politics. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
TERRY, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am
As the Supreme Court put it in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
Henley’s name in a transformative nature invoking the protection of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution” and that “the advertisement is obviously a joke. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
In 2004, the United States Supreme Court answered this question in the case of Hiibel v. [read post]
