Search for: "All Other Claimants" Results 5761 - 5780 of 13,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2016, 1:54 am by INFORRM
Cartier and the other Claimants sought an injunction against the five main ISPs in the UK, requiring them to block access to certain websites that were being used by their operators to infringe their trade mark rights by marketing counterfeit goods under those marks. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 5:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This track record has not been lost on prospective claimants and their attorneys. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
May 16, 2016)So, despite all the commotion surrounding this case, B&B forgot to renew its registration, which was duly cancelled. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The settlement could also boost several other pending initiatives in which organisations representing other shareholder groups are seeking to use the Dutch procedures in connection with the current scandals. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:25 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Any damages awarded to the claimants against the Directors and Officers, including out of court settlements. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
Secondly, either the users or the operators of the website must be infringing the claimant’s trade marks. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:58 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Actually, the better course would have been for Titan to have purchased its own D&O insurance policy providing insurance for all of its directors and officers including Marks. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (In my neighborhood, they use orange cones for small repairs all the time—it’s an easily understood warning sign.) [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am by Jack Kennedy
The claimant disagreed and brought proceedings to the High Court on the following grounds: (1) that the Home Secretary unlawfully and irrationally fettered her discretion; (2) that she erred in her analysis of her obligations under ECHR, art 6; and (3) in light of (1) and (2) she had failed to take into account “all the relevant circumstances”. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Ron Coleman
NYC Beer Co’s proposed mark Others have tried and lost. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:39 am by Katharine Lammiman
” The argument that there was an abuse of power was rejected on the grounds that Mr Hartnett had not targeted the Claimants. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
First, they all but eliminated the dividing line between oppression claims and derivative actions. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Jan von Hein
The results reached and the arguments advanced by the Court, taken all in all, deserve applause. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
This is accomplished by the claim technician obtaining all defense and claimant statements. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:42 pm by Kevin LaCroix
And it may also well be that Australia’s class action procedures and substantive law offer shareholder claimants certain advantages compared to other jurisdictions. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:04 am by Nick Howard
In relation to other regulated entities, the New Rules will act as non-binding guidance. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
This evidence debunks the talking point: Section 440.34(1), Florida Statutes — “A fee, gratuity, or other consideration may not be paid for a claimant in connection with any proceedings arising under this chapter, unless approved by the judge of compensation claims or court having jurisdiction over such proceedings. [read post]