Search for: "C & S Company, Inc." Results 5761 - 5780 of 7,900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm by Jon Sham
 Suit against HarborView stays in court – by Brendan Kearney In the latest development in litigation between residents in Baltimore’s HarborView tower and the property’s condominium association, a city judge has ruled that penthouse owner Paul C. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 5:30 am by William Carleton
According to the agreement, the following ISPs are participating: "SBC Internet Services, Inc., BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Wisconsin Bell, Inc., The… [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm by Marie Louise
TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of STERNALVEST for sternal vests (TTABlog) District Court C D California: The Mongols have their colors back (for real): U.S. v Cavozos (Property, intangible) District Court S D New York: Numb Nuts, Part II: Olaes Enter., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v Gorman, Her Majesty’s Advocate v McDowall and Her Majesty’s Advocate v Paterson, heard 28 – 30 June 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:09 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Together, PPG Paints Trading and its parent company, PPG Industries, Inc., paid $3.75 million in criminal and administrative fines and over $32,000 in restitution. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:30 pm
C-COR, Inc., 413 F.3d 1361, 1369 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:38 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
Because of her lack of specificity, GDC4S filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings in accordance with FRCP 12(c). [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
The Defendant (I’m going to use that term because it’s shorter than the companys name) responded by filing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the § 18 U.S. [read post]