Search for: "Davis v. State" Results 5761 - 5780 of 6,178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As a justice, his dissents in Lochner v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Court Rules That State Bar’s Professional Liability Fund Is NOT Subject to MMSEA Reporting Mark Popolizio, of the Crowe Paradis Services Corp. explains the case of Oregon State Bar Professional Liability Fund v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Andrew Appel
I’ll bet that Secretary of State Raffensperger now appreciates why the Federal Court forced him to stop using those DRE machines (Curling v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
And other states have other tests. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
Flowers (5th Cir. 1990) (involving restrictions on the speech of governmental employees), and reiterated in In re Davis (Tex. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows:  (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred  eighty-four  thousand  dollars  of  the  payor's  annual  income; provided, however, beginning March  first,  two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes  in  the  consumer … [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:42 pm by Carolyn Elefant
  As a result, not only is skills training meaningless in most cases, but it can also give graduates a false sense of security, as a recent Fourth Circuit decision,  Robinson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am by James Bickford
”  The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Schwartz, a law professor at Touro College, writes that the decision in Paul v. [read post]