Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 21,002
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Carter, don't chill free speech and freedom of the press, what does? [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:33 am
In Bartnicki v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:46 am
The case is entitled Small et al. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:16 am
So it becomes a proceeding, does it not? [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Defendant’s assertion that he was reviewing the invoices is too general to defeat the claim (see Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover, 80 AD3d 500, 501 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 702 [2 [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:00 am
Martin v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
One of the main aims of the special counsel regulations that replaced the independent counsel statute was to centralize legal control and accountability in the attorney general. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am
However, in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:39 am
Since, without the expert affidavit, defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden, their motion must be denied without regard to the sufficiency of plaintiffs’ opposition papers (see Suppiah v Kalish,76 AD3d 829, 832 [1st Dept 2010][“By failing to submit the affidavit of an expert, defendant never shifted the burden to plaintiff’]; see generally Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
Generations Cmty. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm
Just ask the Los Angeles City Attorney after the recent decision by the California Court of Appeals in The People v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm
The Clerk shall close the file.Judge Koh's underlying findings of fact and conclusions of law, however, span 233 pages (this post continues below the document):19-05-21 FTC v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:27 pm
Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 205, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that there is no such thing as the “tort of harassment. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:07 pm
In Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
” Certainly—as was suggested during our conversation on the Lawfare podcast last month—we would expect members to ask different kinds of questions during hearings if the goal is to establish a case for impeachment than if they are doing more general investigative work. [read post]
21 May 2019, 7:15 am
Yesterday’s opinion in Mission Product Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:01 am
Little, Zeiger, Tiggs & Little LLP Columbus, for Appellant WBNS-TV Jason Manion, Deputy Solicitor, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, for Amicus State of Ohio in Support of Appellant WBNS-TV Sonia T. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am
In the vast majority of cases, however, the BC Attorney General does not become involved in the day-to-day exercise of prosecutorial discretion. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
