Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 16,613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm
A closer look at Harlan's Plessy dissent, and the wider arc of his career, does not support that contention. . . . [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
In order for the government to prevail in arguing that a statute does not mean what the plain text says — that, there is a “scrivener’s error” or a statute would produce “absurd results” — the government has to show that there is no conceivable possibility that the text was deliberate. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:16 pm
Nor does asking a question about it on the eve of trial. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am
The endorsement guidelines thus inherently, if covertly, recognize that puffery does work. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 12:41 pm
How does [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:23 am
§ 2680(h), known as the “intentional tort” exception. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:12 am
Section 223(h) defines certain of the terms used in the statute. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 2:00 am
A physician acting as “medical director” when the physician does not own the practice. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:16 am
This post reviews the second, H. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 2:00 am
A physician acting as “medical director” when the physician does not own the practice. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
The brief makes another important point: Although Ohio does not endorse Texas's proposed relief, it does endorse its call for a ruling on the meaning of the Electors Clause. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 6:36 pm
We hold that it does not—separating school bath-rooms based on biological sex passes constitutional muster and comports with Title IX. [read post]
4 May 2011, 9:43 pm
What does the individual think about the utility of the Code Committee? [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 4:28 am
Jean H. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
Specifically, it stated that the amendment does not carry out the intent of policy H-7 which is to encourage any endeavor to promote the growth of agriculture. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 7:50 am
CITAP is based on section 216(h) of the Environmental Policy Act (EPAct). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:09 am
Certain energy and petroleum contracts (Regulations, clause 1(2)(f)-(h)). [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
Does 1-100, supra. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 11:19 am
And, the bill does not attempt to cap executive compensation or dictate the form of such compensation. [read post]
