Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 5761 - 5780 of 15,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2008, 2:45 pm
That figure does not include the value of care provided to them at military facilities. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:26 pm by Michael Helfand
 And, as a result, courts are going to have to figure out how to interpret Concepcion quickly - unless, of course, everybody just decides to get cable. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:50 am
I'm still trying to figure out why they even reached this issue. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:15 am by Ken Lammers
"First, I had to figure out what was meant by "innocent possession. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision last month in the Morrison v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:02 am by Mark Summerfield
  Figures released during the California trial reveal that Apple has sold about four times as many smartphones as Samsung in the US, and about 25 times as many tablets. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 3:48 pm by Ron Coleman
“We need to figure out how to reconcile freedom of expression and respect of faith,” he said. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Some are more bright line than others; Google v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
 As is explained below, the $200 figure was significant because one of the ways Virginia Code § 18.2-95 defines “grand larceny” is that a person “commits simple larceny not from the person of another of goods and chattels of the value of $200 or more”. [read post]