Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
Held: In the context of the Framework Decision, the most obvious purpose of insisting EAWs being issued by “judicial authority” was to ensure objectivity (including freedom from political or executive influence) in decision-making and to enhance confidence in a system that was going to lead to a new level of mutual cooperation, including the surrender of member states’ own nationals to other member states. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
Held: In the context of the Framework Decision, the most obvious purpose of insisting EAWs being issued by “judicial authority” was to ensure objectivity (including freedom from political or executive influence) in decision-making and to enhance confidence in a system that was going to lead to a new level of mutual cooperation, including the surrender of member states’ own nationals to other member states. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
On January 30, 2014, the Colorado Court of Appeals decided the case of Taylor Morrison of Colorado, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
In Estate of McCall v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:30 pm
ConnectU where Judge Seeborg held that access in violation of Facebook terms using log-in information supplied by registered users was sufficient to state a claim under Section 502. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm
(Marathon held that a bankruptcy court could not finally decided a state law claim against an entity that was not otherwise part of the bankruptcy proceeding.) [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:54 am
The Lewis v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:55 am
In an opinion issued last week, Dawkins v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 5:30 pm
” The Directive cites Ranjan v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
In that challenge, McCormack v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:47 am
A divided panel said that United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:12 pm
In Tagiyev and Huseynov v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:06 am
In the case of Stichting Ostade Blade v Netherlands (App 8406/06, 27 May 2014) the Third Section of the Court of Human Rights held that an Article 10 application by a Dutch magazine arising out of a police raid was inadmissible. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:18 pm
In its judgment in Case C-531/07 Fachverband der Buch- und Medienwirtschaft v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
Yesterday, in Lorenzo v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:08 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 1:14 pm
In today’s decision in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
Jan. 13, 2012) (“an arbitration agreement imposed upon individual employees as a condition of employment cannot be held to prohibit employees from pursuing an employment-related class, collective, or joint action in a Federal or State court. [read post]
