Search for: "High v State" Results 5761 - 5780 of 35,517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 12:57 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
New York State Urban Development Corp., No. 125: "Judicial review of eminent domain in New York is fundamentally broken" - Damon W. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:32 am
Efforts of the vessel's crew to dislodge the vessel during high tide on August 28th were unsuccessful. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:17 pm by Walter Olson
I’ve got a new post up at Cato at Liberty explaining why the American Electric Power v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:25 am
Last year, we took a look at the case of Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Gibson, Matrix.
The Court of Appeal rejected the argument of the Secretary of the State that Parliament by the 2007 Act had taken a policy decision to place the Upper Tribunal wholly beyond the reach of judicial review. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
High Court Stalemate Lets Emotional Distress Claim Stand." [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 11:42 pm by Florian Mueller
Judge Folsom retired from the bench in 2012 and is now a Jackson Walker partner and based in Texarkana (the one on the Texan side of the state border).Court-ordered mediation rarely results in settlements of such high-stakes global disputes. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 8:33 am by Beth Graham
In May, the United States Supreme Court overturned the Supreme Court of Kentucky’s decision in Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 1:01 pm by Chip Merlin
I recently mentioned the nationwide non-payment of appraisal awards by State Farm inWhy Has State Farm Stopped Paying Appraisal Awards? [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 9:36 am by David Pozen
More recently, David Super has emerged as the academy’s leading critic of the “Convention of States” campaign and of Article V convention drives in general. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
While Lockridge's appeals were pending, an interesting thing happened: the SCOTUS decided Alleyne v United States which held that a judgment of sentence could not be based on a fact that: a) defendant did not admit or, b) was determined to exist beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.In last week's opinion, the Supreme Court, addressing defendant's Alleyne challenge to his sentence, held that Michigan's mandatory sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional based on… [read post]