Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 5761 - 5780 of 7,665
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2010, 3:07 pm by Kelly
If Congress was looking for a way to encourage under-reporting, mark my words, this is it. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:46 pm by Kevin Poulsen
“They may be living a life where people think they’re odd, they’re unusual, they’re eccentric, whatever you want to call it,” says Debbaudt. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:04 pm by Mandelman
I’m posting this speech because I think what she says is important, and because I think it’s very important to see how the people that are actually in charge think about where we are and where we’re headed. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm by Adam Thierer
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 marked an important turning point in this miserable history, as Congress finally acknowledged that facilities-based competition was possible and preferable to the regulated monopoly era of the past. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:56 am by Simon Lester
  For those of you scoring at home, the lawyers quoted below are Mark Feldman and Alicia Cate of the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
I’M HEADING OFF TO A SECURE, UNDISCLOSED LOCATION, and I’ll have a bunch of guestbloggers filling in here: Not only my usual crew of Ann Althouse, Megan McArdle, and Michael Totten, but to lighten the load on them, quite a few others: Ed Driscoll, sometime InstaPundit correspondent Stewart Baker (whose new book on counterterrorism, Skating On Stilts, will be coming out soon), Radley Balko, and Mark Tapscott. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:45 am by Mandelman
  The real-time, mark-to-market losses are kept out of Administration talking points on the cost of the bailout. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:00 am
If you're wondering why the structure collapsed, it was caused by the foreman not understanding the instructions marked on the trusses and he had each installed upside down. [read post]