Search for: "Law v. USA"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 6,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
Moore in USA Today.Baylor University criminal law professor Mark Osler said Monday's decision arises against the backdrop of a broader national re-examination of harsh sentences, but it is most significant in how it views offenders who are under age 18. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
Lakshmanan Fireworks Industries v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
[v] The SEC Certainly the majority of the federal activity on cyber security issues has come from the SEC. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
Kelly-Brown v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 11:31 am
In Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm
"District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 9:55 am
Venkat's recent post on Facebook v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:21 pm
Although the leadership of the Episcopal Church (USA) may treat it as one of its member Dioceses, it has done so only to enable it to become a plaintiff in court as soon as possible. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
The legislation can be broken down into four broad categories: 1) substantive reforms to the laws the NSA believes allow it to conduct its surveillance programs, 2) disclosure of the FISA Court opinions that determined the programs were legal, 3) general reporting of the number and types of surveillance orders received by recipients and how many users affected, and 4) reforms to the FISA Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm
” (Burlington Industries, v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
If it’s the latter, your actions may constitute the type of “AI-washing” that violates the federal securities laws. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Tax compliance efforts ensure that tax law applies evenly to all taxpayers. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Donell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
" We will be presenting it at Marquette Law School later today. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 10:01 pm
It is USA v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
” The November 2, 2011, decision in Sprint Nextel Corporation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 3:41 pm
A more likely interpertation is, that materials purchased for mass production of such videos crossed state lines, is what Congress had in mind, not the construction used to charge Blum in this case.For reasons that are a mystery to this writer, it seens this was not brought up on appeal, and the appeals court went off on a tangent of possession of child porn, see appellate court decision: USA -v- Gregory Blum . [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:07 am
[Herrera v. [read post]
