Search for: "Lively v. State" Results 5761 - 5780 of 29,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm by Amy Howe
The Baders lived in a working-class neighborhood in Brooklyn. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm by Nathan Dorn
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Also, a soft circuit-split: the Sixth Circuit breaks with the Eleventh in electing to spell Anderson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm by Aaron Mackey
By this logic, anything that plaintiffs like Andrews or Woodhull do to make sex work safer, or make sex workers’ lives easier, could be considered illegal under FOSTA. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Constitution guaranteed that every state would have two Senators regardless of population, and immunized the states’ equal representation in the Senate from the ordinary process of amendment in Article V, requiring each state to consent to changing its equal representation in the Senate. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 1:16 am by INFORRM
At the Freedom Forum, Tony Mauro examines some of the steps the Supreme Court has taken in recent years to make the court’s work more transparent (such as an electronic filing system and live audio of oral arguments during the pandemic) and offers a wish list of improvements. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:20 am
  The median age in the United States is around 38. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 8:12 am by Alicia Maule
Supreme Court barred the execution of people with intellectual disability in Atkins v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm by Phil Dixon
In this case from the Northern District of West Virginia, the defendant lived at home with his parents and a cousin. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by David Kris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 11 August 2020 the ICO released a statement on the Court of Appeal judgment  in R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058)  stating that “we welcome the Court of Appeal’s judgment that provides clarification on the police use of live facial recognition technology in public places. [read post]