Search for: "MARSHALL v. MARSHALL" Results 5761 - 5780 of 6,382
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:50 pm
  It wasn't until after sending out seven notes that the jury in the Golden Hour Data Systems, Inc. v. emsCharts, Inc., 2:06cv381 case pending in Judge Ward's court in Marshall returned a verdict. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 5:47 am
One of those people, for example, is Harvard professor and grassroots organizing guru Marshall Ganz. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:24 pm
Specifically, he claimed that those counts did not sufficiently allege statutory aggravating factors, as required by Ring v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:09 pm
Jurors in the Golden Hour Data Systems v. emsCharts case being tried in Marshall federal court this week will get a surprise tonight when they leave the courthouse and see the image to the left. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:09 pm
Dougherty III recently authored an article entitled Marshall v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:45 am
In legal briefs, attorneys for Adultland and owner Eric V. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
I'll post more details later, but I just learned that the Marshall jury in Judge Davis' Mass v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:57 am
This is consistent with other collections, such as Thurgood Marshall's papers. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 9:10 pm
  This afternoon the Marshall jury in Judge Everingham's court rendered a plaintiff's verdict in Agere v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Lopez, No. 081269 Conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is affirmed where: 1) U.S. marshals had no obligation to obtain defendant's consent after defendant's live-in girlfriend consented to the search; and 2) because defendant did not object, his girlfriend's consent was valid and the search was reasonable. [read post]