Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 5761 - 5780
of 21,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 5:27 pm
This decision comes close on the heels of Lum v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:38 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Never any question that state protection is also available for registrable marks. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld a district court ruling that California state officials cannot enforce “slack fill” label and packaging requirements under state law because they are preempted by the federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) and the federal Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA).Remember how the FMIA and PPIA have language prohibiting any regulation of “marking, labeling, packaging or ingredient requirements … in addition to,… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:32 am
That changed with Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:30 am
In the case of Palek v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:28 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Our good friend Professor Mark Weber has a new law review article. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:48 am
The prosecution should not necessarily be able to introduce the letter in its case in chief, but the state should pay for relocation of or a security detail for these key witnesses. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
For Education Week, Mark Walsh revisits a landmark school-speech decision, Tinker v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:01 am
Hal-Mark Rental Center, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:33 am
Marks & Spencer. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 2:47 pm
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am
This month marks the 25th anniversary of Davis v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 1:44 pm
I send thanks to Attorney Mark A. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:17 pm
In State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:21 am
Instead, she stated only that “the blue background with the yellow circle plainly forms a substantial part of the [Lidl Work]”. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:16 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
This marks the third annual appearance of this memo, which by US standards makes it a tradition. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm
This case, which will be argued on Monday, marks the third time since 2018 that the court has tangled with the stop-time rule, with previous rendezvous in Pereira v. [read post]
