Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 5761 - 5780 of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2021, 6:25 pm
It was with this in mind that one might usefully approach the recognition, publicly (and at last) of the massacre of a large portion of the Chinese population of Torreón, in the Mexican state of Coahuila, to be acknowledged by Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador who will ask forgiveness of the Chinese community  on behalf of the state. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 3:21 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Divisional Court upheld the AFRAAT’s decision in United Food and Commercial Workers International Union v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Lishman (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1288), or a more deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review (as held by Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:58 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
In this connection, a reference has also been made by the learned Attorney General to the decision in Narandas Karsondas V. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
Last week HHJ Dancey published a second judgment in a case involving allegations of rape and domestic abuse including coercive and controlling behaviour (the judgment is A Child (Application of PD12J : No.2 – Findings of Fact) [2022] EWFC 2). [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
This is then tied to Chinese policy in Xinjiang ( 55). [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:18 pm by centerforartlaw
Landmark Copyright case: Thaler v Perlmutter[3] (For an in-depth case review of Thaler v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:04 pm by Elin Hofverberg
Väinö Tanner 5 years, 6 months imprisonment. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by Jonathan Fitchen
The majority (for the benefit of non-UK readers, when there is a majority the law is to be understood to be stated on this matter by  that majority in a manner as authoritative as if there had been unanimity across all five judges) considered that there was no choice of an applicable law pertinent to Art.3 of Rome I in the underlying contract by which Enka’s services had been engaged. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:02 am by Andrew J. Batog
Ius de non evocando As the court in Pinochet notes with respect to crimes against the law of nations, there is a duty incumbent upon any potential forum state to defer to the proceedings of an international court or a court in a state which would otherwise have jurisdiction.[7] “Without question, the intervening entity or state must exercise great caution before concluding that intervention is necessary… …the emphasis must remain on… [read post]