Search for: "People v. Polite" Results 5761 - 5780 of 13,784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
In Part VI, I argue that, again echoing Locke and Sidney, a prominent group of American clergymen insisted that, contrary to the anti-democratic jeers of monarchists, God had given people the capacity for reason which enabled them to make meaningful decisions about their political future. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (458 U.S. 457, 1982) and Hunter v Erickson (393 U.S. 385, 1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:46 am by Erika Bachiochi
These canons mirror the Constitution’s structure as a whole, protecting the people in our constitutional democracy from the whims and personal preferences of politically unaccountable judges. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:55 am by SHG
The fact that the New York City Police Department has openly and flagrantly chosen to ignore DeBour (that's the New York flavor of Terry v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
She tweeted, amongst other things, that “South Africa has shown moral leadership in bringing its application to the ICJ under the Genocide Convention, to protect the Palestinian people in Gaza. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm by Lisa McElroy
Many people were watching the case closely, because recusal laws like Nevada’s are common in the United States; a ruling in Carrigan’s favor could have had a real impact on our political system. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:51 pm
Before I get into the constitutional (and political) implications of SCC’s decision in R. v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm by CPoplin
It’s a question that for most people exists more in theory than in practice. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm by Sam Murrant
It must be said, it does seem strange in a country priding itself on “government by the people, for the people” that judges can exert political power to this extent. [read post]