Search for: "S. et al"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 29,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2007, 6:09 am
., the Court is scheduled to hear arguments in New York State Board of Elections, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 12:16 pm
Elexco Land Services, Inc. et al (Susquehanna County Pa March 3, 2009) that had been pending in the Pennsylvania Superior Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 7:03 pm
A US federal judge Friday ordered the state of Louisiana to pay a USD 3.8 million settlement for legal fees to the Center for Reproductive Rights and law firms who challenged the state’s abortion restrictions on doctors in June Medical Services LLC et al v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 12:40 pm
Fishel et al., (“Acordia I”), in which the Court held that when a company that was the original party to a noncompete agreement merges in to another company, unless the noncompete agreement contained a “successors and assigns” clause, the merger was a termination of employment which triggered the running of the restrictive period in the noncompete. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 12:40 pm
Brinker International, one of the world's leading casual dining restaurant companies, announced yesterday that the California Supreme Court has issued an opinion in Brinker Restaurant Corp. et al. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2006, 8:25 am
Insulation Distributors inc., et al., 2006 N.Y. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 12:45 pm
BMW of North America, LLC et al., Civil Action No. 20-510-LPS (D.Del. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
In National Association of Homebuilders, et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 10:17 am
Express Co., et al., No. 08-5442-cv , January 21, 2010 Citing: H.R. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
Abel TED STRICKLAND, et al., Defendants NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION BY DEFENDANTS OF CHANGES TO DEFENDANTS' POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE EXECUTION OF CONDEMNED PRISONERS Pursuant to the Court’s order of October 19, 2009 and the court’s direction to advise it about the Defendants’ deliberations, counsel for the defendants now enters this notice. 1. [read post]
14 May 2014, 11:45 am
City of Boston, et al., No. 12-2280 (1st Cir. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:22 pm
The City of New York, et al. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:56 am
Jon Michael Barker et al. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:56 am
Jon Michael Barker et al. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:42 pm
Thyssenkrupp Elevator Americas Corporation, et al., C.A. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:48 pm
The Sixth Circuit completely disregarded the Government’s waiver argument. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:26 am
Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of California – October 5, 2022) involves two class action claims. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 5:33 pm
., et al., an as-yet unpublished decision, affirmed a California District Court ruling that has the potential significantly to affect advertising law and the use of the California unfair competition statute at B&P Code §17200, et seq. to regulate commerce. http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/13-1286.Opinion.12-26-2013.1.PDF In that case, the Federal Circuit affirmed that a California unfair competition claim is limited in injunctive effect… [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 5:33 pm
., et al., an as-yet unpublished decision, affirmed a California District Court ruling that has the potential significantly to affect advertising law and the use of the California unfair competition statute at B&P Code §17200, et seq. to regulate commerce. http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/13-1286.Opinion.12-26-2013.1.PDF In that case, the Federal Circuit affirmed that a California unfair competition claim is limited in injunctive effect… [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 4:55 pm
Had blogs not forced their hands, Reuters et al. would have gladly kow-towed to their rich friends.We now know who are real enemies are...Or at least we're starting to see. [read post]
