Search for: "SMITH v. STATE"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 10,017
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
Smith v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:04 pm
Smith on May 6 found Miller “does not have the right to choose his attorney or operate in Propria Persona. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:20 pm
Three jurors from Smith’s trial have sinced signed affidavits stating that if life without parole had been an option, they would have voted for it. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:59 am
Smith, which held that there is no free exercise violation when states apply a rule of general applicability to religiously motivated conduct. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 2:56 am
R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster & Ors) v North Yorkshire County Council, heard 3 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe Estates Ltd (Scotland), heard 4 December 2019 AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4-5 December 2019. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 3:57 am
In Armatas v Kestenbaum 2020 NY Slip Op 07846 [189 AD3d 1319] December 23, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department a city attorney-defendant kept at it until the case was dismissed on all grounds, actual or academic. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 1:34 pm
In an essay forthcoming in a symposium issue of the Syracuse Law Review, I argue that taken at face value, DC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
Smith and David K. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 4:54 pm
In People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:26 am
”* The court, noting that “until just a few days ago, the governing law on this question had been settled in this State for going on 150 years,” citing Smith v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm
" But in Pistacchio v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm
Weber State Univ. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:49 pm
” Both sides argued that a 2006 decision, Temlock v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:35 pm
” Both sides argued that a 2006 decision, Temlock v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:38 pm
Supreme Court's 2002 ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:49 pm
” Both sides argued that a 2006 decision, Temlock v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:04 pm
Yes, says New York’s Court of Appeals in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:48 pm
In Long v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:20 am
Such an extension, however, would accord such upward departures even greater protection than they had under the mandatory Guidelines.In United States v. [read post]
