Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 7,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2010, 10:07 am
On Wednesday in Robertson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:37 am
Below, Stanford Law School’s Jacqueline de Armas recaps Tuesday’s ruling in Graham County Soil & Water Dist. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:56 am
Check the Barber v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:14 am
Instead, it stated that Mr. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:06 am
Allstate, which cleared the way for certain class action suits which were formerly limited by state laws. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm
And although the State contended that a ruling covering both misadvice and omission would lead to a “flood” of challenges of existing guilty pleas made by noncitizen defendants, the Court countered that a similar concern was raised in Hill v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:19 pm
The case is Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:45 pm
Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 10:57 am
In Nunez v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:38 am
” Only Justice Stevens openly adopted McCowan’s interpretation, stating firmly, “I don’t think the test is deadlock. [read post]
Minimal Change In Structure With Approved Area Variance Does Not Justify Denial Of Amended Variances
1 Apr 2010, 8:11 am
-Steven Silverberg [read post]
Minimal Change In Structure With Approved Area Variance Does Not Justify Denial Of Amended Variances
1 Apr 2010, 8:11 am
" -Steven Silverberg [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:48 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:32 am
See, United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:19 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Shady Grove v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:33 am
Yesterday, in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:01 pm
In Padilla v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm
As detailed at New York Criminal Law and Procedure the United States Supreme Court in a decision authored by Justice Stevens held that as a matter of federal constitutional law, attorneys have a professional duty to advise their clients of immigration consequences, at least when those consequences are clear. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm
For as much as I wholeheartedly agree with Justice Stevens’s contention that the possibility of a lifetime of exile from the United States is perhaps the most serious collateral consequence imaginable, the fact remains that it is still a federal issue which is entirely separate from state-based criminal systems. [read post]
