Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 5761 - 5780
of 6,067
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2008, 7:10 am
See, California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 5:25 am
Texaco, Inc., 73 Fed.App. 78 (5th Cir. 2003); and Frank C. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:33 am
Ingle v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:29 am
C'mon Google, I think you can do better. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
"The First Sale Doctrine" limits the CR distribution right to the first sale, without which there would be no resale market for second hand books, etc. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 7:30 pm
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Ohio Sept. 28, 2007) (no jurisdiction under CAFA after finding that plaintiff was precluded from bringing class action under Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act); and Arabian v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:34 am
S 6841 BLURB : CP L. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 3:03 am
Case Name: Christensen v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 3:03 am
Case Name: Christensen v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Rees, -U .S. ,128 S. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:46 am
Not Applicant Kelly C. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
It’s described in the December case list as involving the issue of whether title passed to the federal government according to the plaintiff’s contracts at the time Plaintiff took possession of the items, thus establishing the sale for resale exemption recognized in Day & Zimmerman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 11:11 am
Taking the facts most favorably to the defendant who prevailed on his suppression motion, the officer had reasonable suspicion for the defendant's stop in a grocery store parking lot known for hand to hand drug sales. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Geneva Int’l Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
She also--enter CAFA--sought to certify a statewide class based on claims for alleged violation of Ohio’s Consumer Sales Practices Act and Retail Installment Sales Act. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Day, No. 05-4285 "Order resentencing defendant following his guilty plea to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute over one thousand kilograms of marijuana is vacated where the court violated: 1) defendant's right to be present at resentencing; 2) his right to notice that the court intended to impose an adverse non-Guidelines sentence; and 3) 18 U.S.C. section 3553(c), which requires a sentencing judge to state in open court the reasons for… [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 10:04 am
Cir. 2006); C olida v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 7:27 am
" As a result, the court reasoned the plaintiff could not assert that it would be irreparably harmed by future sales by the defendant, having already been compensated for the harm caused by the defendant's entry to the market. [read post]
