Search for: "Sayed v. Page" Results 5761 - 5780 of 12,185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 1:10 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Adam Wagner was typically quick and right on Twitter yesterday to draw our attention to the relevant cases: Praha v Czech Republic, and Otto v Germany, neither of which is specifically about this three-month period but rather the six-month time limit for bringing your claim to the ECtHR in the first place. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:09 pm by Brooks Holland
Today, however, I was really struck with something Justice Scalia included in his concurring opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Nothing going on down in Columbus, so let’s head over to the courts of appeals… A judgment of conviction must included disposition of the forfeiture specifications, says the 8th District in State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 11:40 am by INFORRM
The British press has made much of the injunction granted by the Court of Appeal in PJS v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am by Peter Margulies
Trump took a novel turn: Judges Gould, Hawkins, and Paez focused on what the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) actually says. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
This post is only from the Reed Smith (more properly, the non-Dechert) side of the blog.One hundred what, you say? [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:25 pm
Yesterday's oral argument in Gentry v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:32 pm
Justice Scalia, admittedly not the AmeriKat's favorite Justice, even questioned during oral arguments in Omega v Costco why Congress didn't say that if that is what it intended. [read post]