Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 23,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, September 29, 2018 Tags: Capital markets, Cryptocurrency, Derivatives, Disclosure, Engagement, Exchange-traded funds, Human capital, Investment advisers, Oversight, Retail investors, SEC, US House The SEC and Foreign Private Issuers: A Path to Optimal Public Enforcement Posted by Yuliya Guseva (Rutgers), on Sunday, September 30, 2018 Tags: Compliance and disclosure… [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
by Dennis Crouch I previously wrote about the Real Foods v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 12:36 pm
That takes us to the recent decision of the Court of Federal Claims in Electra-Med Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:48 am
RainSoft v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:46 am
Burton v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
MiMedx Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:50 am
Section 110(c)(5) should be deleted. 1798.120(c): The language is inconsistent about 16 year olds (or, if you read the restriction as applying only to 14 and 15 year olds, then it’s inconsistent about 13 year olds): “a business shall not sell the personal information of consumers if the business has actual knowledge that the consumer is less than 16 years of age, unless the consumer, in the case of consumers between 13 and 16 years of age, or the consumer’s… [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 12:00 am
In fact, in Kelo v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:58 am
But then along comes a case like Air & Liquid Systems v DeVries, set for argument the last day of the October session. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:51 am
Apple v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:23 am
In the recent case TLE Marketing Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 6:29 am
In Glidepath Limited v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
The first is Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:40 am
For financial reasons, Patrick wanted to sell his home in Scarsdale and move with his children to Manhattan. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In its September 26, 2018 decision in Fasano v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 8:48 pm
Turning first to the plain language of the statute, the court found MCALA to generally require a person to have a license whenever he does business as a collection agency in the State, which MCALA defined in BR § 7-101(d):(d) “Collection agency” means a person who engages directly or indirectly in the business of: (1)(i) collecting for, or soliciting from another, a consumer claim; or (ii)… [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 1:32 pm
In Andrews v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:58 am
"If only 1% of all class action plaintiffs wanted to attend the January FTC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm
The Second Circuit found this pricing mechanism was different than the Maryland program struck down by the Supreme Court in Hughes v. [read post]
