Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 10,139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2014, 5:26 am
In 2013, the United States sought to obtain certain information about a target in a criminal investigation. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
The courts in the United States do not recognize the "well-known mark" basis for relief (but see Grupo Gigante v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 10:24 am
” Under United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:05 am
Paige v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Bauman, 134 S.Ct. 746 (2014), and having done so we recommend it to anyone representing overseas clients worried about being swept into the maw of the overlawyered legal climate in the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:44 am
The United States Code isn't listed in the FAQ, but when I searched for statutes I found them. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:36 am
It’s uncharted territory, but I seriously doubt that pervasive and persistent surveillance of that nature comports with the Fourth Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am
Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
United States saga, you are missing out on quite the show. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:15 am
Hearings at Guantanamo Bay on United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm
United States (1938). [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:43 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has taken on two high-profile intellectual property cases, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
In breathtakingly short order, the Third Circuit has issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
”[v] This is fundamentally unfair to the collection of tax revenues by the RTA and Cook County because American and United Airlines primarily operate in Cook County. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:49 am
The answer could be “always,” under United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:46 pm
Then, quoting Standard Oil v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
United States, 13-7120. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The so-called mandate, which was the subject of the much discussed NFIB v. [read post]
