Search for: "Sides v. Beene"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 25,494
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
It has been acknowledged by the Group of Seven, and by the European Union as well. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
This has been repeatedly confirmed both by local courts and the ECtHR (P v Poland [2012] ECHR 1853). [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:26 am
Of course, given that Descovy has been shown to have significantly fewer side effects compared to Truvada (particularly a lower risk of kidney damage), the NHS is likely to face pressure to provide Descovy instead of Truvada.A debate to be hadIs the price of PrEP really that prohibitive for developed nations? [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 7:31 pm
The recent arbitration decision in Acadia University v Acadia University Faculty Association is instructive in this regard. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
Being a lawyer has been my ministry. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 7:44 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 8:44 am
The USPTO partially-instituted the proceedings (on some, but not all grounds) but then sided with the patentee — finding that the claims had not been proven unpatentable. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:13 pm
If corporate fiduciary stands on both sides of a challenged transaction, an instance where the directors’ loyalty has been called into question, the burden shifts to the fiduciaries to demonstrate the ‘entire fairness’ of the transaction. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:02 am
In the opinion, the District Judge held that to establish a copyright claim there are two separate enquiries to be undergoneL The first is whether the defendant factually copied portions of plaintiff’s work, and second being those expressions that have been copied are protectable expressions and important to the copied work, citing Gates Rubber Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:49 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
Whether the lawyers encouraged it or the client demanded it I can’t tell, but the big winners were the lawyers on both sides. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:56 pm
Huck’s August 23, 2019 sanctions order in Johnson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:00 pm
The appellate court was really, really, bothered by this, as they should have been. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 12:33 pm
The case is Hazel Kennedy v Dr Jonathan Frankel [2009] EWHC 106 (QB) (25 January 2019). [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:52 am
The restraining order was in response to a lawsuit, Glassman v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:51 pm
I described the key issues at stake in this 2017 post: In its unanimous decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:22 am
Stouffer v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 6:45 am
The August 19, 2020 decision in Landis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 5:02 am
McDermott v. [read post]
