Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 5761 - 5780 of 37,717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2021, 12:05 pm by Greg Mersol
” Moreover, when deciding whether to certify a case as a collective action, the Fifth Circuit stated that courts should examine issues related to the merits of the plaintiff’s claims and whether the members of the putative collective are similarly situated with regard to the factors that will be relevant to determining the merits of the plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am by Andrew J. Grotto
The director will: [S]erve as the principal advisor to the President on cybersecurity policy and strategy relating to the coordination of [cyber defense, cyber-related diplomacy, understanding and deterring malicious cyber actors, and engaging with industry, among others] [§ 1752(A)] [O]ffer advice and consultation to the National Security Council and its staff, the Homeland Security Council and its staff, and relevant Federal departments and agencies, for their consideration… [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Herb Lin, Amy Zegart
The commission’s mandate should not be limited only to uncovering what happened and making recommendations. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am by Jo Ann Hoffman & Associates, P.A.
(v) Subtotal C is the amount of recovery of the FECA beneficiary; (2) Subtract the amount of attorney’s fees actually paid, but not more than the maximum amount of attorney’s fees, from Subtotal C. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:45 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The recent New Brunswick labour arbitration decision in Unifor, Local 907 and J.B. v Irving Paper Limited, 2020 CanLII 38613 (NB LA) tells the unfortunate tale of an alcoholic’s losing battle to overcome his addiction and losing his job in the process. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am by Rui Dias
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 6:59 pm by Roelke Law, P.A.
The appellate court first stated that in a grand theft case, the State must prove the value of the stolen property is greater than $300 pursuant to Florida Statute § 812.014(2)(c)1. [read post]