Search for: "State v. Files" Results 5761 - 5780 of 91,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2010, 10:58 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  He also gave the United States 30 days to file a surreply. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 6:03 pm
And you filed an affirmative asylum claim within a year of coming to the United States (i.e., the DHS didn't catch you).Plus you've got Judge Reinhardt on the panel, and he writes the opinion.In such a setting, you're going to be granted asylum. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:28 am
On July 21, the Michigan Supreme Court issued four orders granting leave to file amici briefs, one order granting temporary admission to practice, one order granting extension of the time to file a brief, one order denying reconsideration of an order, one order dismissing on stipulation an application for leave to appeal, and one order denying recusal of Justice Hathaway in United States Fidelity Insurance & Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by David Ardia
This is part V in a series of posts discussing First Amendment Limits on State Laws Targeting Election Misinformation, 20 First Amend. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 6:38 am
Section 1983.Coombes and the other defendants filed separate summary judgment motions on all federal and state law claims. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm by Zachary Spilman
Finding first that Appellant introduced deadly force into the situation, thereby eliminating the ability of further escalation, citing United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am by John Jascob
In late May, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin and Montana State Auditor Monica Lindeen had each filed petitions with the court requesting judicial review of the legality of the Commission’s expansion of the exemptions available under Regulation A. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]