Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 16,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2017, 7:00 pm
The Court held in 2008’s Boumediene v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The much-anticipated decision in NT 1 & NT 2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) was handed down on 13 April 2018. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:22 am
OpinionShort Title/District 07a0410p.06 Stewart v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:08 am
Here are the government's main concerns relating to the ILD Policy and the revised membership policy, as set forth in its Amended Complaint (with some minor modifications by me): 1. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Phillips, No. 07-0522 Grant of habeas petition ordering conviction be vacated based on state's Brady violation is vacated in part as to barring of retrial of count of depraved indifference murder as petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies with respect to that relief. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 11:15 am
State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
United States Forest Service v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
Part I - People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 12:27 pm
Ritzen Group v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:10 pm
Virginia and Johnson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm
Likewise, allowing abortion on demand generally, including in the third trimester, is supported only by 20% of the public (up from 13% four years ago), and allowing it in the second trimester (basically the Roe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:49 am
Facts: This case (Michel v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:04 pm
(See Barlow v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm
The former husband's petition did not contain an affidavit stating that he did not have access to the minor child to perform the DNA test within 90 days prior to the filing of the petition or that the trial court should order DNA testing of the minor child. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 6:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
At the time, a Supreme Court justice even considered Alice a “minor case” in following its prior § 101 framework set forth in Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:01 pm
Shapiro of New York City.As a point of comparison, he cites Harper v. [read post]
