Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 36,818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2022, 6:32 pm
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:39 pm
Town of Greece v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Dicta in an early case, Hylton v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:50 pm
But if the state can't prove that fact, then the statute does indeed violate the free speech rights of the LSAC. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm
I agree with Rick’s take on the oral argument in Connecticut v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 7:09 am
Illya Bond (Power Source ) U.S. and Plaintiff States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:28 am
Florida Power Corp. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:30 am
The philosopher John Locke had characterised the power to determine a state’s international relations as the ‘federative’ function of the state, distinct from its three domestic functions (of execution, legislation, and adjudication). [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm
PerDiemCo LLC reads like my recent Civil Procedure final exam.[1] The topic is personal jurisdiction–when may a Federal Court exercise its power over an out-of-state patentee in a declaratory judgment action challenging the patent’s validity. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 5:15 am
Inequitable conduct remains the most powerful defense to patent infringement. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:59 pm
Today, Texas state trial Judge David Peeples issued a decision in Van Stean v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:15 am
Judge Hendrix summarizes his opinion in Texas v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2025, 11:45 pm
This case illustrates how much power and discretion the Circuit Justice has. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:45 am
For its analysis, the US attempted to align its argument with the Supreme Court’s approach in Edmond v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 8:16 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 4:27 am
The 9th discussed the power of a confession, and the problems that the state would have getting the statement in. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am
“The Supreme Court should…reaffirm that the Constitution’s prohibition against ex post facto lawmaking forbids states from skirting constitutional scrutiny by simply labeling penalties as ‘civil'” [Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey on Cato certiorari brief in Bethea v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
