Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 5,863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2012, 2:22 pm
In most states, the answer is No. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:01 am
One illuminating example of this behavior came last year in the oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am
Think, perhaps, of the case of Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:05 am
The Supreme Court created the doctrine of qualified immunity in a 1967 decision in the case Pierson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:28 am
So it was during the argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:27 am
The answer in the case of Paroline v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:06 am
But the case the Times cites, Missouri v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 2:03 pm
Michael Dreeben, the deputy solicitor general who argued on behalf of the United States, faced a slightly more (but not completely) receptive audience. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:48 am
., v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 12:10 pm
The Court issued the 5-4 decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
She notes the historical value of dissents and concurrences in cases such as Plessy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
The case was Glossip v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:22 am
The ruling in the case of Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a statement regarding the denial of review in which she described the facts of Halprin’s case as “deeply disturbing” but explained that she did not dissent from the court’s order today because “state-court proceedings are underway to address – and, if appropriate, to remedy – Halprin’s assertion that insidious racial and religious bias infected his trial. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm
Justice Elena Kagan echoed Sotomayor’s concerns. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 1:54 pm
Griffin's perspective is evident in the opening line of her post: "Lost in the muddled oral argument of Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v EEOC was the case’s central question: Are religious groups entitled to disobey the law? [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Kennedy asked several questions about whether Hobby Lobby could avoid a substantial burden on its religious exercise by dropping insurance altogether and paying an annual “tax” of $2,000 per employee. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
One key opinion is Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm
The lead case is Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
