Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 40,650
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2021, 1:59 am
The ultimate test however is, as stated by the court in Cowbell, whether, on comparison of the two marks, there is a likelihood of confusion”. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:19 am
Arizona Board of Regents v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 6:02 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 2:48 am
" He did state reasons on Twitter that didn't convince me because it sounded like Apple's app review practices were going to inform the interpretation of the Epic v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
In the 1982 case of Edgar v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm
This “secret tragedy” (The Sun’s words) was hardly secret because it concerns public domain information which The Sun was delighted to publish “Exclusive”(ly) (The Sun’s word). [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 12:00 pm
" Note the use of the word "spirit. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
EVERY WORD IN THIS DISCUSSION MATTERS. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 3:15 pm
" In other words, OSHA must clear a higher hurdle than is required for a regular workplace standard of the act. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 10:18 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 9:53 am
Here's a follow-up to my commentary on the Epic Games v. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 12:41 am
Yesterday's Epic Games v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 2:18 pm
" In NFIB v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 12:30 pm
Dissent: The Supreme Court hasn't overruled Roe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 11:36 am
(See Dean v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 11:36 am
(See Dean v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:53 am
Remember, in NFIB v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:33 am
“Both of these assumptions involve predictions about a consumer’s thoughts and impressions after reviewing C2R’s advertisements—in other words, how consumers perceive the statements at issue in this litigation. [read post]
