Search for: "US Constitution Petition" Results 5761 - 5780 of 12,705
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2016, 12:01 pm by Jason Rantanen
Patentees’ have even complained that the filing of individual IPR petitions has affected their stock prices. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Copyright on Useful Articles: Although not a patent case, the court also decided to hear a “useful article” copyright case. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
As I have written about here, North Carolina’s HB2 is patently unconstitutional, and lawsuits challenging it on constitutional grounds have already been filed.But HB2 also has a Title IX problem to the extent it prevents public schools (or private colleges that receive any federal funding) from allowing transgender students to use the bathroom aligned with their gender identity. [read post]
2 May 2016, 7:00 am by James Goodman
On October 14, 2015, the California Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs’ Petition for Review, and the case is pending. [read post]
2 May 2016, 7:00 am by James (Jim) A. Goodman
On October 14, 2015, the California Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs’ Petition for Review, and the case is pending. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 3:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
The trial court denied the parts of the petition which were to annul the BZA’s determination to grant the applications for a certificate of existing use and an extension of nonconforming use. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 RT: issue: continuing right to use; can the market take care of it? [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 3:44 am by SHG
The use of this feed anywhere else violates copyright. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 3:54 am
Finally, the Court rejected petitioners’ claims that permitting the libraries to download digital scans of their own books constituted infringement: “Google’s provision of digital copies to participating libraries, authorizing them to make non-infringing uses, is non infringing, and the mere speculative possibility that the libraries might allow use of their copies in an infringing manner does not make Google a contributory infringer. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:17 am
Volokh thinks it might:Now whether such agreements, entered into by the government, are constitutional is a complicated question. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm by John Ehrett
In its Conference of April 29, 2016, the Court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether, for federal habeas purposes, California’s procedural rule generally barring review of claims that were available but not raised on direct appeal is an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim; the appropriate test to determine when a feature of a useful article is protectable under Section 101 of the Copyright Act; and whether… [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Patricia Salkin
The lower court affirmed the board’s decision determining that the proposed sale of beer and wine failed to constitute a substantial change in use, and failed to constitute a detriment to the neighborhood. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Protected conduct includes "any other [1] conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech [2] in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Protected conduct includes "any other [1] conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech [2] in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:19 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to get her petition in the Washington Redskins trademark dispute before the justices,” using an “unusual strategy invoked a rarely used rule of the Supreme Court that allows parties to seek certiorari before an appeals court has ruled. [read post]