Search for: "United States of America v " Results 5761 - 5780 of 8,953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm by Alfred Brophy
 One of them, for instance, is United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 8:18 pm
But it makes plain as day that the United States cannot avoid habeas corpus review simply by detaining prisoners outside the United States, even if they are foreign nationals. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
As of 1789, most indigenous people within the boundaries of the United States lived in non-State territories claimed by the United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Kate Huddleston
HB4 is extreme anti-immigrant state legislation, and an extraordinary state arrogation of the exclusively federal power to regulate entry to and exit from the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
For example, in many law schools, the sky was falling when United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:39 pm by ReNika Moore
 H.R. 40 is a critical first step toward addressing the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of the institution of slavery in the United States and its legacy. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am by Sarah Libowsky, Krista Oehlke
The United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is but one example. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
  In America, for example, several claims have been brought under the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), which gives federal courts power to hear civil cases brought by foreign citizens for injuries caused by actions “in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Ken Jost at Jost on Justice, who observes that jurors “may bring other kinds of bias into the jury room, but those cases are no reason to back away from one limited safeguard against the racial discrimination that still pervades criminal justice in the United States,” and from Mark Joseph Stern in Slate, who asks how, if Chief Justice John Roberts does not recognize the pernicious effects of racial bias in this case, Roberts can “ever… [read post]