Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 24,118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2008, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:34 am
REV. 409, 427 (2007); United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:03 am
Shultz Former Secretary of State General Michael V. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:10 am
United States, 436 U.S. 128, 138, 98 S. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi’s entire opinion is available for viewing online. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:11 pm
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant.Civil Action No.: 09-1931 (RMU)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA2011 U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am
For example, in 2017, the CERD stated it was “deeply concerned” that “[v]iolations of the land rights of indigenous peoples continue” and that “[c]ostly, time-consuming and ineffective litigation is often the only remedy, in place of seeking free, prior and informed consent — resulting in the State party continuing to issue permits which allow for damage to lands. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:48 am
This is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:48 am
This is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Linden J also correctly stated that a religion or belief must meet some modest requirements to be protected under Article 9, citing Williamson and, interestingly, the Strasbourg decision in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 for this proposition (para 136). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
It was submitted that the Patreon subscriptions were stable inasmuch as they remained in place until cancelled. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:31 pm
Plaintiff Philpot later registered the photograph with the United States Copyright Office. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:19 pm
And what better way to top things off, than with a quick update in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:19 am
United States, 566 U.S. ___ (2009). [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 10:39 am
Ins. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 10:39 am
Ins. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
United States—a case raising crucial questions of religious freedom law and, most importantly, statutory interpretation. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
In Arista Records v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:47 pm
Place (see esp. at pp. 706-07) and Illinois v. [read post]
