Search for: ""UNITED STATES" FEDERAL CORPORATION"
Results 561 - 580
of 13,327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2021, 9:15 am
On April 6, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, holding that Sharp Electronics Corporation (Sharp) and Vizio Inc. did not infringe Wi-LAN, Inc. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:46 am
In the United States, Credit Suisse operates as a Financial Holding Company regulated by the Federal Reserve, and offers private banking and wealth management services to over two million clients, focusing on ultra-high-net-worth and high-net-worth individual clients around the globe.On Feb. 23, 2011, former Credit Suisse employees: Marco Parenti Adami, Emanuel Agustino,Michele Bergantino, and Roger Schaerer were indicted by a federal grand jury in the Eastern… [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:58 pm
Just 12 days ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its ruling in TiVo v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:19 pm
But this avid sports fan continued to work in the industry after the XFL fumbled, and moved next to the United States Tennis Association in 2002, as chief legal officer and general counsel. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:40 pm
On December 12, 2006, the United States Deputy Attorney General, Paul J. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
AGS CJ Corporation (Tribal Gaming; Tribal Lease Agreements) United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Rakoff, Senior United States District Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Gregory Strong, Partner, DLx Law Lunch and Keynote11:45 AM-1:15 PM The Honorable Jed S. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm
It does not necessarily mean "affiliated with the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:10 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:37 am
United States, which is being argued on Jan. 17. [read post]
29 May 2018, 11:44 am
United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., the plaintiff was a woman who filed a product liability lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking compensation from the defendants, which allegedly designed or manufactured a Yamaha VXS WaveRunner personal watercraft. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., the plaintiff was a woman who filed a product liability lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking compensation from the defendants, which allegedly designed or manufactured a Yamaha VXS WaveRunner personal watercraft. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:32 am
As with all Restatements, the purpose of the proposed Restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:32 am
As with all Restatements, the purpose of the proposed Restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 10:48 am
The United States removed the case to federal court. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:25 pm
—The CEO shall be an individual who— (i) is a citizen of the United States; (ii) satisfies the qualifications to serve as a Director under section 90307; and (iii) by reason of professional background and experience, is especially qualified to manage the Corporation. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 9:40 am
Back in January of 2023, the FTC proposed a new regulation limiting the majority of non-compete agreements in the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:58 am
While these rule changes would specifically impact cases in federal court, they would also likely impact state court rules as well, as states frequently adopt the Federal Rules as their own. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 11:56 am
B) If corporate officers or shareholders qualify as "persons" under § 1592(a), can they be held personally liable for duties and penalties imposed under § 1592(c)(2) and (3) when, while acting within the course and scope of their employment on behalf of the corporation by which they are employed, they provide inaccurate information relating to the entry or introduction of merchandise into the United States by their corporation? [read post]
