Search for: ""citizen's united"" Results 561 - 580 of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2015, 5:12 pm
"The Supreme Court's Citizens United decision continues to echo": Amanda Hollis-Brusky has this essay online at The Los Angeles Times. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:52 pm
We Don't Need No Stinking Facts: The Montana Supreme Court, SCOTUS, and Citizens United. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:34 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Here is the abstract: In January 2010, the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 6:07 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court decreed in Citizens United that "[n]o sufficient governmental interest justifies limits on the political speech of nonprofit or for-profit corporations. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:01 am by Brian Wolfman
Over the longer term, I think we need to seriously consider mobilizing a constitutional amendment process to overturn Citizens United (assuming the Supreme Court doesn’t revisit it). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:28 am
"Citizens United Unleashed: A new ruling draws on the conservative First Amendment precedent to potentially re-enfranchise thousands of Floridians. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:33 am
"'Citizens United' Backlash: Montana Supreme Court Upholds State's Corporate Campaign Spending Ban. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 9:47 am by Rick Hasen
The post May 7 CAP Online Event on Citizens United Includes Sheldon Whitehouse, Shana Broussard, Jamie Raskin, Sarah Haan and Tom Moore appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 8:20 pm
"Not Everyone Hates Citizens United: The landmark campaign finance ruling made local TV stations very, very rich. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:08 am
"Thanks, Citizens United, for This Campaign Finance Mess We're In; Apologists for this damaging Supreme Court decision are wrong on the facts and the law": Adam Skaggs has this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:46 pm
"In Montana, Corporations Aren't People: Can Montana get away with defying the Supreme Court on Citizens United? [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:48 am by Dan
Yesterday, Elizabeth Lynch of the China Law & Policy Blog, testified before the United States Congress on "potential foreign government influence in our elections post-Citizens United. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:36 am by Mark Walsh
” It was perhaps a continuation of the Citizens United theme, or a reference to a key phrase from the Court’s voting rights jurisprudence. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:30 am by Howard Wasserman
That would not eliminate independent expression of the type at issue in Citizens United, including speech by corporations. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Montana’s arguments in support of the judgment below either were already rejected in Citizens United, or fail to meaningfully distinguish that case. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Montana’s arguments in support of the judgment below either were already rejected in Citizens United, or fail to meaningfully distinguish that case. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Montana’s arguments in support of the judgment below either were already rejected in Citizens United, or fail to meaningfully distinguish that case. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:58 am by Rick Hasen
Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United case lifted many of the legal restrictions on the political activities of nonprofit organizations funded by corporations. [read post]