Search for: "***redding v. County Court" Results 561 - 580 of 1,058
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Crozer Chester Medical Center, 765 A.2d 786 (Pa. 2001) (red flag is about an unrelated issue), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that only the amount actually accepted by a health care provider as payment in full for services rendered was recoverable economic loss in a personal injury action. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:05 am by Diane Marie Amann
Delivering the keynote address will be Fatou Bensouda (left), Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, whom I am honored to serve as Special Adviser on Children in and affected by Armed Conflict. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 FEDERAL COURT Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania Heebner v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
Whelan, in Flax v Shirian, 2014 NY Slip Op 51229(U) [Sup Ct, Suffolk County Aug. 15, 2014], the court mercifully decreed death for a hopelessly dysfunctional, multi-member real estate holding company identified by one side as 27th Street Associates, LLC, by the other side as 27th Street, LLC, and in the property deeds and records of the New York Department of State, as 27 Street LLC. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am by S S
Aster Communities Ltd (formerly Flourish homes Ltd) v Akerman-Livingstone [2014] EWCA Civ 1081 (30 July 2014) is an extraordinary decision that will – if allowed to stand – have a significant impact on the day-to-day management of possession claims in the county court. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The score on Primus motions to dismiss, as of today’s date, is nine to three[11] — nine courts nationally have agreed that Primus owed duties of reasonable care to consumers and that victims’ complaints sufficiently alleged breach of that duty and causation as well. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
The score on Primus motions to dismiss, as of today’s date, is nine to three[11] — nine courts nationally have agreed that Primus owed duties of reasonable care to consumers and that victims’ complaints sufficiently alleged breach of that duty and causation as well. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:29 pm by Howard Knopf
  It’s interesting to contrast the UK Red Bus decision with the recent  controversial US 2nd Circuit decision in Cariou v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:03 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The Maryland Court of  Special Appeals decided a chain reaction automobile tort case last week in Cooper v. [read post]