Search for: "*long v. Murphy"
Results 561 - 580
of 755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am
Although the legal premise for such cases arose in the 1980s (see, for example State (O’Connell) v Fawsitt [1986] I.R. 362 and Murphy v DPP [1989] I.L.R.M. 71) real interest in the “missing evidence” concept as a method to seek to force the prohibition of an impending trial did not gather pace until the early 2000s. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
On Monday, we celebrated the 44th anniversary of an important civil rights milestone, the Supreme Court decision in the ACLU case Loving v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm
While for most Americans, Loving v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 6:24 pm
As if the lesson hadn't be learned long ago: It's the coverup that gets you. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am
You’ll long be remembered, whenever we say: “Fair winds and a following sea! [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
The only reason removal is even possible prior to service is due to the advent of electronic case filing and waiver of service rules that could not have been foreseen when the current removal statute was enacted.Id. at *6 (discussing and attempting to analogize to Murphy Brothers, Inc., v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Referee Crespo also bases his rejection of DLOM on case law, including Vick v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:31 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:15 pm
” Citing Murphy v American Home Prods. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:22 am
Crowley was referring to the salaries of Michael V. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:30 am
[Purdy] gave him a five dollar discount because he waited so long, and [Hyde] paid [him] eighty dollars in cash, using marked bills. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Hall v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
If an agreement was varied, then protection could arise long after the agreement was made. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Not too long ago a case here in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Slater v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
Add caption Knut is dead, but long live ..? [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
Bennett, et al. (10-238) and McComish, et al., v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:16 am
Henderson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:23 am
http://tinyurl.com/47udhb6 (Philip Gordon) Davis v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
In his reasons, Cronin J approved reasoning of Coates FM in Murphy v Murphy [2009] FMCAfam 270 where his Honour determined a legal practitioner meant a person entitled to practice in the jurisdiction. [read post]
