Search for: "*u. S. v. Kennedy"
Results 561 - 580
of 733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 11:02 am
The U. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:34 pm
V. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Justice Kennedy penned the 9-0 decision. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:49 am
Flook, 437 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am
” Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority, and citing Diamond v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:28 am
Justice Kennedy's concluding comments are worthy of note: "Today, the Court once again declines to impose limitations on the Patent Act that are inconsistent with the Act’s text. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm
The Supreme Court held in Holder v Humanitarian Law Project that one can be convicted of a crime for violating 18 U. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
Patterson Black v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
See Yates v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:56 am
But where the state court is merely adjudicating between private actors -- as it is in most common law property, contract, and torts cases -- the proper rubric seems to me to be Justice Kennedy's due-process analysis.UPDATE: Proving that there's no idea I can have that Lior Strahilevitz can't have more clearly and at least five days sooner, here's a link to his excellent post from a few days ago at the U. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm
Supreme Court decided the case of Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:49 am
Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
The United States Supreme Court released its judgment in City Of Ontario, California, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm
S. 438 (1928), overruled by Katz v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:06 am
Virginia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:50 am
Schware v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:56 am
Quon decided; city’s access of employee’s text messages was reasonable under O’Connor v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:38 am
S. 413, 415–416, District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
On Monday, June 7, 2010, in Barber v. [read post]
