Search for: "-MKM Stephens et al"
Results 561 - 580
of 991
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
North American Indian Law: A Basic Bibliography (PDF) Patrick S. [read post]
26 May 2012, 5:58 pm
adidas America, Inc. et al v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:20 pm
NMFS described the “Allee effect”: The decrease in per capita population growth as population size declines is often referred to as the ‘‘Allee effect’’ or ‘‘depensation’’ (see references in Oleson et al., 2010) . [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:12 pm
In a stay application (Chafee, et al., v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm
., et al., v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:33 pm
LANGONE, et al., Defendants-Appellees, LARRY M. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:13 pm
Sony BMG Music et al. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:48 am
Daniel Martin Katz and Michael Bommarito commented on the statistical methodology used in the study, and that the study uses government data made public through RECAP, the open government data project developed by Harlan Yu, Stephen Schultze, and Timothy B. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:19 am
The courts of Ituri in the DRC were more than capable of delivering justice for Lubanga et al after significant EU finding and local work. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:32 pm
Adidas America, Inc et al v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:45 am
Instead of providing a mere counter point to the above authors, Budd et. al, I have also included at least one other author who is skeptical about the first group but will say different things than I will. [read post]
5 May 2012, 6:36 pm
The respondents of the case are Humberto Cruz, et al. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:36 pm
The defendant and respondent et al of the case is Gleason Estates Associates, LP. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:34 pm
Mitchel Eilenberg et al. are listed as the respondents. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:01 pm
The sequel case is American Tradition Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:39 pm
Mark Labib et al. are third party plaintiffs-respondents. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:38 pm
In this case, Roxrun Estates, Inc. et al, are the respondents-appellants, and the Roxbury Run Village Association, Inc et al., is the other appellant-respondent and defendants. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:34 pm
The Assessor, et al. and the Town of Clarkstown were respondents, while the Clarkstown Central School District #1 was the nonparty-respondent. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 3:21 pm
Peters and the defendant in this case is the City of New York, et al. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:41 am
McDougall: We write concerning completion of the interrogatories process with respect to the sample of Opt-Out Institutions, which is required as a result of the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal dismissing the application for judicial review brought by the AUCC et al. [read post]
