Search for: ". OD"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,528
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
In the present case neither the impugned decision nor the minutes of the OPs before the OD contain indications regarding the new ground for opposition or its dismissal, so that it is not clear according to which criteria the OD has exercised its discretion. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The OD has expressed the opinion that, considering the entire text of the claim as well as paragraph [0009] of the patent in suit, the missing verb was to be read as “containing”. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The specification mentions ethanol as preferred antifoam […].[2] In the impugned decision the Opposition Division (OD) had come to the conclusion that e.g. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus the principles developed in decision T 1002/92 did not apply to the case which the OD had to decide. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:24 pm
I am heading to the funeral of my friend Linda Rivera. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board does not follow this reasoning and essentially endorses the opinion of the OD according to which the Colorado Project K40 all-metal deflector (cf. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This decision on a revocation appeal contains (among other things) an interesting discussion of apportionment of costs.[45] A 104(1) provides that:“Each party to the opposition proceedings shall bear the costs it has incurred, unless the Opposition Division (OD), for reasons of equity, orders, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations, a different apportionment of costs. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:45 am
Recent, widespread reports that US inflation remains tame in the face of ever-loose monetary policy have been met with skepticism from certain folks because the most common metric - "core CPI" - omits rising food and fuel prices. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
In the decision now under appeal, the Opposition Division (OD) found that the amended description according to the main request did not comply with A 84, since the sentence “It is clear that similar comments apply to the composition R125 - 46.5%, R134A - 50% and R600 - 3.5%” had not been deleted. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This is a revocation appeal.The Opposition Division (OD) had revoked the patent on the basis that the patent as amended according to the auxiliary requests did not meet the requirement of A 123(3). [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
According to established jurisprudence this finding applies to decisions of opposition divisions (OD) and ED (see e.g. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
The board shares the OD’s view that the introduction of this feature into claim 1 does not contravene A 123(2). [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
The decision of the OD in this respect is correct.The OD has decided to introduce D2 into the proceedings because this document was considered to be more relevant for the question of novelty than D1. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
It would, however, also have been open to the OD to continue the proceedings of its own motion under R 60(2) EPC 1973 (now R 84(2)). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm
Stryker, No. 11-0041-CV-W-ODS, 2013 U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
For this objective to be attained, the submissions on the grounds for opposition have to be understandable for both the patent proprietor and the OD without further investigations (T 2/89 [5]). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm
According to the document, "Although safe for the ozone layer, the continued emissions of HFCs -- primarily as alternatives to ODS but also from the continued production of HCFC-22 -- will have an immediate and significant effect on the Earth's climate system. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
However, apart from the specific submissions already addressed in the previous paragraphs and considered not persuasive by the Board, the [patent proprietor] has failed to identify any particular deficiency in the reasoning of the OD – such as gaps in the line of argument developed by the OD, or inconsistencies in the available evidence, or contradictions between the written evidence and the witnesses’ declarations – that would be at variance with the standard of… [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 4:19 pm
I have started looking up old Louisville Courier-Journal articles for members of the Brandeis and Harlan families, with the goal of posting here anything interesting I find. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am
He is on the following medication: Co-Codomal Tablets 2 prn 30 tablet 15. 2.2013 Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Tablets 50 mg od 40 tablet 13.12.2011 Citaloprara Hydrobromide Tablets 40 mg od tablet 25. 2.2013 Due to the above medical condition, [IA] is finding it difficult to cope and will need help and support with his daily needs. [read post]
