Search for: "A, B & C Insurance Companies" Results 561 - 580 of 2,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 8:27 am by Ira Meislik
Oh, I also forgot, each insurance company could claim that the other insurance company covered the same property and you can’t get paid twice for the same damaged or destroyed property. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 1:10 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
How else can you explain: a) $36,920 deductible for a pain and suffering award in a car accident claim b) $73,840 deductible for a pain and suffering award if involved in 2 car accidents c) $110,760 deductible for a pain and suffering award if involved in 3 car accidents! [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 12:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The trial court concluded that the exclusion was unenforceable under Section 541(c), and the insurer appealed. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:32 pm
The order formed the basis of a settlement by Travelers Insurance Company to resolve claims against it for conspiracy in concealing information about the dangers of asbestos.In 1986, the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s worse than that b/c of the difference b/t disruptive and incremental innovation. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 2:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
This makes the companies “the insured named in the policy” authorized to reject  the UM/UIM. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:29 am by MBettman
When that doctrine apples, the policy exclusion for intentional acts kicks in as a matter of law, and the insurance company has no further obligation. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 9:00 am by Picl Guest Blogger
High-risk zones start with the letters A or V, while low-to-moderate risk zones include zones B, C, and X. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 11:54 am by J
On the “duty” point, it argued: (a)   there was a duty to insurance in line with the CML guidelines; (b)  those included “explosions” as a usual risk; (c)   that was, on its ordinary meaning, apt to include explosions caused by terrorism (with support derived from Commonwealth Smelting v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:15 am
So, the premium, from an actuarial point of view and the point of view of the insurance company should be the cost of the treatment you are seeking. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
  It would be interesting to conduct a survey amongst participants in the D&O insurance industry to find out whether people think that D&O insurers (a) are adequately reserved for these future losses; (b) think they are adequately reserved but will find out in the future they are not adequately reserved; or (c) are not adequately reserved. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:25 am by Mark S. Humphreys
B-0002-02 January 2, 2002 TO: REGULATED PERSONS AND ENTITIES, INCLUDING ALL INSURANCE COMPANIES, CORPORATIONS, EXCHANGES, MUTUALS, RECIPROCALS, ASSOCIATIONS, LLOYD'S, HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS, ... [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Blog Editorial
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess… [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 5:18 am by Tom Cummings
Medicare Part C (aka Medicare Advantage) offers healthcare plan options run by Medicare-approved private insurance companies. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:04 am by Peter Vodola
 It exists only to enable a bettor with superior knowledge of the insured's health to pick an insurance company's pocket. [read post]