Search for: "ANTHONY v. THE STATE (three cases)"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:12 am
In three cases from the spring and early summer (Spriggs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:12 am
In three cases from the spring and early summer (Spriggs v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
Yesterday’s retirement announcement by Justice Anthony Kennedy dominates coverage of and commentary on the court. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy In Boumediene et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Finally, JURIST’s Jaclyn Belczyk covers Thursday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
At The Washington Free Beacon, Kevin Daley reports that Monday’s decision in Ramos v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:18 pm
The fourth involves the conviction of three FARC members in relation to the kidnapping of a U.S. citizen (United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 2:19 pm
Herewith a guest post from Anthony Rickey: Three law firms filed papers last Friday seeking fees for their victory in rescinding Elon Musk’s $55.8 billion pay package at Tesla. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:22 pm
As the Court heard the case of Schuette v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:16 pm
Very early in his tenure, in Texas v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:43 pm
Hinton and State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:44 am
Former US President Donald Trump credited himself with overturning the landmark reproductive rights case Roe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:01 am
Four Justices have already answered that question in their dissent three years ago in Douglas v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
Albrecht, which raises questions about whether a state-law failure-to-warn claim is pre-empted by federal law regulating the safety and efficacy of prescription drugs, and Obduskey v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:57 pm
Phelps and United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost notes that “[t]he case poses a seeming quandary for [Justice Anthony] Kennedy, who can rightly claim gay rights and freedom of speech as parts of his three-decade legacy. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
In the travel-ban case, Trump v. [read post]
